Growing up in a middle-class family I have always thought of increasing property value as a good thing. I’ve watched my parents strategically plan when and where to move (we moved 4 times, though I was never a fan) all throughout my childhood. It wasn’t until this past summer that I understood how increasing affluence of any given neighborhood actually systematically drives out communities of people who were already living there. This summer I interned at a documentary film company, The Film Posse, that was working on a documentary about Lorraine Hansberry–a playwright most known A Raisin in the Sun. A Raisin in the Sun is about an African American family living in chicago in the 1960 who tries to move out of their kitchenette apartment and into a white suburb. As part of my internship, I worked on multimedia content for the film’s website and outlined a podcast series about modern-day housing discrimination in Boston. It was through conversations with leaders in the housing accessibility movement in Dorchester County that I came to understand rising property value as a form of housing discrimination that systematically forces people out of their homes and away from public resources. In starting to look more into gentrification for this project, I’m curious to learn about how gentrification in LA is similar to or different from gentrification in Boston, especially considering the presence of different cultural communities and economic ecosystems of the city. I found one article on Policy Mic that explains how LA Skid Row is being overrun with hipsters who are pushing out the homeless. Perhaps the most poignant quote in the article to summarize the situation in LA is: “To come in and take Skid Row, where people who have no choices—so that these other populations can come and have their sort of Disneyland Manhattan experience—is outrageous.” The rest of the article is definitely worth a read and can be found here.

One question I want to contemplate this semester is given that gentrification affects lower-income populations, how does new media engage with those populations using media that is physically accessible to them? I found an interactive map that shows gentrification trends in LA. The website explains, “The primary purpose for our website is to inform community based organizations (CBOs), policy makers, activists, and urban planners who are trying to mitigate the negative effects of gentrification, such as residential and business displacement.” I find resources like this so, incredibly important. Rather than catering real estate investors or business investors who in fact perpetuate gentrification, they are providing a resource for people who are working to redress the negative affects of gentrification. Additionally, it is a resource that is available and accessible to the public. Additionally, the website encourages interactivity between the consumer and the creator. While nobody can just go make changes to the website, they encourage users to alert them to new trends they are seeing in gentrification in LA. As I am not a housing expert and other than being interested in the topic, I don’t know of many housing accessibility activists in the area. Next, I would be interested to learn if and how housing accessibility activists use a resource like this.


2 responses »

  1. I took a course a few semesters back on Urban Planning and it was interested to read literature from over the last few decades and how the idea of gentrification has sort of changed within our collective subconsciousness. Many researchers we read would try to argue the other side as well- that gentrification can raise the standard of living in a neighborhood or make it statistically safer.

  2. haircomestrouble says:

    I’m kind of torn between the two extremes: poverty is poverty regardless of where it is located, so to be poor on one part of town is no different than being poor on the other part of town, but does that give developers the right to push you over to that other part of town? And if this is a area of town that can be made safer and more valuable by gentrification, is it entirely an unworthy goal?

    I imagine that the goal should be to made to include a way of not just increasing the property value, but also finding a way to include the poor in the process so that their lot in life has increased. Ii have no idea how to do that, though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s